The Herald, Sharon, Pa.

Breaking News

Local News

October 15, 2012

Internet gambling parlors must close by Oct. 22, DA says

MERCER COUNTY —

This may be the last week to “bet” at Internet sweepstakes parlors in Mercer County.

Mercer County District Attorney Robert G. Kochems has put the operators of these establishments in the county on notice that come next week, they will need to close up shop to abide by the law.

“I will direct law enforcement authorities to being prosecuting violations of the law beginning Oct. 22,” Kochems wrote in a letter he sent to operators. “This gives you time to give notice to your employees and to see if a new stay of the law is agreed to.”

The businesses have been in operation for about a year in Pennsylvania.

They’re either a potentially profitable “game” that offers a prize like the popular Monopoly game at McDonald’s or they’re an attempt to skirt the state’s gambling laws.

U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania sided with the latter argument when Judge Robert D. Mariani denied a motion for a retraining order and preliminary injunction filed by an operator of the machines in Luzerne County.

That ruling lets stand a law Gov. Tom Corbett signed June 30 to close the “legal loophole” by which the parlors operated, state Rep. Mark Longietti, Hermitage, D-7th District, said at the time.

“It was a loophole that needed closing,” Longietti said in July.

The sweepstakes operate by selling customers phone cards which entered them into a finite sweepstakes pool. People can either redeem the cards immediately to find out if they’ve “won” or “lost” or use the cards to purchase Internet time and play casino-like games to eventually reveal if they’ve “won” or “lost.”

They’re popular here, said Miracle Petrino, who managers one parlor in Sharon and another in Hermitage.

“It’s a shame, because people love it,” Petrino said. “I’m hoping that another appeal will be filed and they’ll accept it and we’ll stay open.”

Otherwise, they’ll be closed this time next week, she said, indicating she won’t fight it by testing local police’s enforcement of the law.

Text Only
Local News
  • Council takes ‘baby step’ toward exiting Act 47

    For 26 years, Farrell’s been in financial trouble.

    May 21, 2013

  • Drug tests get tentative board OK

    Carol Sloan, a Hermitage resident, had three concerns about the proposed voluntary student drug testing program in Hermitage schools, one of which was the possibility of spending tax dollars on the program.

    May 21, 2013

  • School board proposes 1st tax hike in 6 years

    Hermitage School Board is proposing the first property tax hike since 2007-08 under a 2013-14 budget tentatively approved Monday.

    May 21, 2013

  • School district facing big deficit and hard choices

    Sharon City School Board on Monday unanimously approved a preliminary budget for the 2013-14 school year includes a $2 million deficit.

    May 21, 2013

  • More than a million in Pa. denied right to vote

    More than 1 million registered voters in Pennsylvania will be barred from casting a ballot Tuesday because the state only allows registered Democrats and Republicans to participate in the primary election.

    May 21, 2013

  • District reserves to cover $500,000 shortfall

    Although Mercer Area School District has a $500,000 shortfall in its budget for the coming school year, school directors do not plan to raise taxes.

    May 20, 2013

  • Yes and no on voter ID

    After another “dry run” of a voter ID law under legal review, Pennsylvania voters might start chafing.

    May 20, 2013

  • Crash claims 21-year-old

    A 21-year-old Sandy Lake man was killed early Saturday when he lost control of his car and rolled it several times on Hadley Road, Perry Township.

    May 19, 2013

  • UPMC to judge: Throw out bias claim

    UPMC Horizon has asked a federal judge to throw out a former employee’s claim that he was discriminated against because of his gender.

    May 19, 2013

  • Judge Christopher St. John Judicial daily double

    This year marks the first time in the county’s 209 years as a judicial district that voters have the opportunity to choose a new judge, while also deciding whether to retain an existing one.

    May 19, 2013 1 Photo