The Herald, Sharon, Pa.

Breaking News

Local News

January 8, 2013

Council ready to raise rental inspection fee

SHARON — With 1,328 rental properties in housing stock, much of which has decayed in recent decades, Sharon officials have their work cut out in trying to clean up the city.

One tool that's used in this effort -- a rental inspection ordinance -- will see its landlord licensing fee skyrocket from $15 to $50 every two years for each party. The increase -- and the extra $12,000 it's expected to bring in -- is included in the 2013 city budget, City Manager Scott Andrejchak said.

But city council has to formally approve the change, and its members briefly hashed over the increase Monday. No residents or landlords came to protest during the work session.

“This isn’t a crackdown on landlords, it’s trying to tighten up the business operation,” council Vice President Ed Palanski said.

The hike would be the second since the program began in 2004 and would help cover the cost the city devotes to inspections.

 Council members in spring 2010 passed an ordinance raising the fee from $3 to $15 per dwelling. That fee covers buildings with up to three units and there are additional fees for apartment buildings larger than that.

Currently, rental properties are supposed to be inspected every two years and tenants are to be registered with the city.

In 2008, former Mayor Bob Lucas suggested allowing landlords to hire private inspectors and said even a $50 fee wouldn’t cover the cost of the city overseeing the program. Council didn’t act on the suggestion then.

The rental inspection program began in about 2004.

In December, landlord Anthony Delgros spoke against the hike.

“The city is being restrictive to development. This is just another nail in the coffin,” Delgros said, noting the city has a high wage tax and property tax, as well.

The change works out to an additional $1.50 per month per unit for the term of the license.

Council will vote to formally introduce the change during its Jan. 17 meeting and could adopt the change in February.

 

Text Only
Local News
  • Council takes ‘baby step’ toward exiting Act 47

    For 26 years, Farrell’s been in financial trouble.

    May 21, 2013

  • Drug tests get tentative board OK

    Carol Sloan, a Hermitage resident, had three concerns about the proposed voluntary student drug testing program in Hermitage schools, one of which was the possibility of spending tax dollars on the program.

    May 21, 2013

  • School board proposes 1st tax hike in 6 years

    Hermitage School Board is proposing the first property tax hike since 2007-08 under a 2013-14 budget tentatively approved Monday.

    May 21, 2013

  • School district facing big deficit and hard choices

    Sharon City School Board on Monday unanimously approved a preliminary budget for the 2013-14 school year includes a $2 million deficit.

    May 21, 2013

  • More than a million in Pa. denied right to vote

    More than 1 million registered voters in Pennsylvania will be barred from casting a ballot Tuesday because the state only allows registered Democrats and Republicans to participate in the primary election.

    May 21, 2013

  • District reserves to cover $500,000 shortfall

    Although Mercer Area School District has a $500,000 shortfall in its budget for the coming school year, school directors do not plan to raise taxes.

    May 20, 2013

  • Yes and no on voter ID

    After another “dry run” of a voter ID law under legal review, Pennsylvania voters might start chafing.

    May 20, 2013

  • Crash claims 21-year-old

    A 21-year-old Sandy Lake man was killed early Saturday when he lost control of his car and rolled it several times on Hadley Road, Perry Township.

    May 19, 2013

  • UPMC to judge: Throw out bias claim

    UPMC Horizon has asked a federal judge to throw out a former employee’s claim that he was discriminated against because of his gender.

    May 19, 2013

  • Judge Christopher St. John Judicial daily double

    This year marks the first time in the county’s 209 years as a judicial district that voters have the opportunity to choose a new judge, while also deciding whether to retain an existing one.

    May 19, 2013 1 Photo